Online Classes: Lessons Learned

The Fall 2020 academic term is approaching the end. While many of us transitioned to online teaching and learning at the start of COVID-19 pandemic, or went through a full online course in summer, this was the first full-load academic term that was entirely online. We prepared for this all summer, as much as we could. We had workshops on how to design and run online courses, discussed how to keep students emotionally engaged, and shared our ideas on how to balance asynchronous and synchronous activities to make sure we don't lose the human contact when we go online.

But nothing could fully prepare us for what was coming: having thousands of students taking full load of courses without ever seeing the instructors, TAs, and each other. Even for those of us who had done online courses before, this was a new experience as we were dealing with normal-size classes of students who, just like us, were isolated, who have been isolated for months, and still were taking regular number of courses, and possibly working their jobs, online.

I am grateful for all the university efforts to support and prepare for the fall term, all the discussions and workshops, the resources, and also my own personal experience of designing and running online courses. They were all helpful and based on two sets of feedback that I collected from my students (a class of about 60 3rd-years), they resulted in a reasonably successful experience. But each new course we teach will teach us something new, and this one certainly had major lessons to learn. While some of these lessons may not be totally new, they turned out to be more significant due to special circumstances of this term compared to previous online courses:
  • The students were taking all their courses online, so they didn't have any in-person contact with any of their instructors and classmates.    
  • Everyone had been through months of pandemic which affected them all emotionally, physically, and probably financially.
Amidst the uncertainly of future, there is one thing almost for sure and that is an online academic term in winter. So, it is important to review some of the lessons we learned this term and make sure we plan things better in winter. Here are some of the things I found out:
  • "Zoom fatigue" is real (see the articles below). I feel overwhelmed and exhausted by too much video conferencing and I'm sure students feel the same. Nobody wants to watch a live lecture online. Recorded videos are life-savers and they have to be short. Breaking a topic into segments with particular subject will make the experience a lot more manageable. 
  • Keeping students emotionally engaged is critical. We knew that. But it requires listening to them. I used two mid-term feedback surveys, online discussions, and weekly reflection assignments to keep students engaged but also to hear what they would like to see in the course, what interests and excites them, and how they want to be engaged. Closing the feedback loop, having a real conversation, and actually acting on what we hear are needed for that engaging experience we are hoping to have.
  • Tools matter. I used a popular communication app (Discord) to facilitate communication. It worked very well and much better than online discussions on cuLearn (which I still kept as an option for more formal graded discussions). I assigned group tasks to be done on Discord that supports text, audio, and video chats. My live sessions always had a task (academic or social) to be done on Discord and these were very successful and appreciated.
  • Live sessions are important to keep students engaged and have real-time communication. On the other hand, asynchronous mode of teaching and having recorded videos are also important. The balance was certainly harder than I thought. While I didn't lecture during the live sessions and only reviewed the topics and tasks, I found myself more and more going towards having short live tutorials and examples. This was what many students would want to see and could result in them being more engaged. The drawback was unfairness to those who couldn't attend, even though all sessions were recorded and made available. 
  • Content structure can be a game-changer. We record our lectures and live sessions to make them available; we upload many examples and references to answer all possible questions the students would ask in face-to-face classes; we send emails and post announcements; we have assignments and tasks. These are all helpful but can be overwhelming too. Again, finding a balance between too much and not enough is hard, and a big help comes from content structure and organization. There are different ways to organize the content and communication in an online course and discussing them is beyond the scope of this post. But suffices to say that throwing loads of material at students can result in them losing interest in accessing anything or finding it hard to find what they need. Examples of things to do are grouping tasks together, using a calendar, collecting communication into one weekly announcement, using a proper portal, and FAQ sheets.
  • Coordinating with other instructors helps. As we bombard our students with content and tasks, we should remember that there are other colleagues doing the same.   
I look forward to hearing from other faculty members, and students, about their experience this term and lessons they learned.

Popular posts from this blog

Anyone Can Code: Algorithmic Thinking (new open-access book)

 My second book in the Anyone Can Code series, titled Algorithmic Thinking, is now available as an open-access resource: https://ali-arya.com/anyonecancode/   As the second book in the series, Algorithmic Thinking focuses on the logic behind computer programming and software design. With a data-centred approach, it starts with simple algorithms that work on simple data items and advances to more complex ones covering data structures and classes. Examples are given in C/C++ and Python and use both plain text and graphics applications to illustrate the concepts in different languages and forms. With the advances in artificial intelligence and automated code generators, it is essential to learn about the logic of what a code needs to do, not just how to write the code. Anyone Can Code: Algorithmic Thinking is suitable for anyone who aims to improve their programming skills and go beyond the simple craft of programming, stepping into the world of algorithm design.   ...
Read more

Learner-Centred Practices

 Last week, April 24th, I attended Carleton University's Teaching Innovation Symposium, InspirED 2024 . It was an interesting and informative collection of talks, in a friendly and welcoming environment. I enjoyed getting together with colleagues in such events, especially because I have not done much of that since the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to listening to various presentations and discussions, I took the speaker role at two sessions. With online classes and conferences, and being on leave for almost two years, I felt a little rusty and nervous speaking in front of a live crowd, but I think it went well. In my first presentation ( PowerPoint , PDF ), I talked about Teaching with Virtual/Augmented/Extended Reality. Based on more than a decade of working on using virtual environments in education, I discussed the motivations, risks, and barriers to using such tools in education. I mentioned how we need further research on Inclusion, Suitability and efficacy, Personalization ...
Read more

What truth can AI tell?

ChatGPT and other conversational agents (chatbots) based on artificial intelligence (AI) have experienced rapid growth recently. Their application and impact are being widely discussed, and so are the importance and ways to regulate them . When Geoffrey Hinton left Google with concerns about spam, government abuse, and super-intelligent machines, more attention was drawn to possible risks. Chatbots' shortcomings in giving an answer that can be considered “the truth” have been questioned to the point that Elon Musk is proposing an alternative to the existing products, referred to as TruthGPT. Such efforts aim at an AI that s not trained by incorrect, biased, or limited data and so can give the true answers. In a short article , Mark Bailey (National Intelligence University, USA) and Susan Schneider (Florida Atlantic University, USA) argue that chatbots shouldn’t decide what’s true. Their argument is based on the black-box nature of artificial neural networks that prevent transpar...
Read more